Archives for posts with tag: language

[Writing like this for the censors
but I won't hide behind words
]*



I can’t write a poem to manipulate you; it will not succeed. Perhaps you have read such poems and decided you don’t care for poetry; something turned you away. I can’t write a poem from dishonest motives; it will betray its shoddy provenance, like an ill-made tool, a scissors, a drill, it will not serve its purpose, it will come apart in your hands at the point of stress. I can’t write a poem simply from good intentions, wanting to set things right, make it all better; the energy will leak out of it, it will end by meaning less than it says.

I can’t write a poem that transcends my own limits, though poetry has often pushed me beyond old horizons, and writing a poem has shown me how far out a part of me was walking beyond the rest. I can expect a reader to feel my limits as I cannot, in terms of her or his own landscape, to ask: But what has this to do with me? Do I exist in this poem? And this is not a simple or naive question. We go to poetry because we believe it has something to do with us. We also go to poetry to receive the experience of the not me, enter a field of vision we could not otherwise apprehend.

Someone writing a poem believes in a reader, in readers, of that poem. The “who” of that reader quivers like a jellyfish. Self-reference is always possible: that my “I” is a universal “we,” that the reader is my clone. That sending letters to myself is enough for attention to be paid. That my chip of mirror contains the world.

But most often someone writing a poem believes in, depends on, a delicate, vibrating range of difference, that an “I” can become a “we” without extinguishing others, that a partly common language exists to which strangers can bring their own heartbeat, memories, images. A language that itself has learned from the heartbeat, memories, images of strangers.

ADRIENNE RICH 1929-2012
from “Someone is Writing a Poem”
Poetry Magazine
, 1993

Don’t Flinch
Coldfront
Essential Rich

*Pictured above: RICH, Telephone Ringing in the Labyrinth p68.


…think of me as part Hegel, part Tinker Bell, worshipping absolute candor (Mallarmé), counter-geography (Wallace Stevens), and the egotistical sublime (Keats)…

Or as Eliot puts it in Murder in the Cathedral, ‘This is one moment/ But know that another/ shall pierce you with a sudden painful joy.’

The unfamiliar and beautiful play made things bearable that day…

So when people say that poetry is a luxury, or an option, or for the educated middle classes, or that it shouldn’t be read at school because it is irrelevant, or any of the strange and stupid things that are said about poetry and its place in our lives, I suspect that the people doing the saying have had things pretty easy. A tough life needs a tough language – and that is what poetry is. That is what literature offers – a language powerful enough to say how it is.

JEANETTE WINTERSON, from “Shafts of Sunlight” The Guardian | November 2008


“cinema is the wind in the trees”
D. W. Griffith

MARK COUSINS’ brilliant/thrilling 15-hour immersion course on the evolving language of film and the historic influences of world cinema, The Story of Film: An Odyssey, receives an encore marathon screening today and Sunday at TIFF beginning at 9:15AM—FREE. Essential viewing.

see also: Hear director Mark Cousins’ Q&A at the TIFF screenings here

Photo: KIRBY

Language is a skin: I rub my language against the other. It is as if I had words instead of fingers, or fingers at the tip of my words. My language trembles with desire. The emotion derives from a double contact: on the one hand, a whole activity of discourse discreetly, indirectly focuses upon a single signified, which is “I desire you,” and releases, nourishes, ramifies it to the point of explosion (language experiences orgasm upon touching itself); on the other hand, I enwrap the other in my words, I caress, brush against, talk up this contact, I extend myself to make the commentary to which I submit the relation endure.

(No one wants to speak of love unless it is for someone.)

ROLAND BARTHES, from A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments

Photo source: Rome is Burning (not wf)

I pass these in Metro Hall on my “rainy day route” to work at the Film Reference Library, TIFF Bell Lightbox.

Sculpture: MICAH LEXIER
Photos: KIRBY

“Yale’s Sterling Memorial Library is chock-full of loonies, of whom I am one.”

While one huddles in a corner with a shell-shocked look, another reads the Turkish newspaper aloud. Still another, pricked by some devil, will leap from his seat in the reading room and shout an apostolic harangue until he is shushed, then rescued and defended by me. I am receptacular to these odd outscourings of the human race. They are argumentative, arrogant, often smelly and irritating, but it is the irritation of a grain of sand to an oyster: there is always the possibility of a pearl. Besides, how many of us would be thought sane were our lives examined closely?

V. has decided to “take on” Philip Roth. “It’s time someone took him on.” E. has again “strained my head” and must lie in the darkness for some weeks. D. is visited at night by angels in the form of shooting stars. He is deep into his marijuana and vodka, a blend of giddiness and self-pity. All three at least have the advantage of being mad. Their view of what is around them is clear and definite. The rest of us are conscious of our self-delusion, and this is what disturbs us. It will be what remains after we have finished with our dreams and ambitions. My own life seems to have been a series of jerky, aimless zigzags, spermatozoic, instinctive, irrational, an inborn error of metabolism over which I have no control, only redeemed by the gift of language. I shall always believe that our own humanity depends upon the accuracy with which we are able to perceive the suffering around us, and to be witness to it.

RICHARD SELZER, Diary. New Haven, CT: YaleUP, 2011.

Photo: Student w Radio sm Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University, 1930

We delight in our sensuous involvement with the materials of language, we long to join words to the world—to close the gap between ourselves and things—and we suffer from doubt and anxiety because of our inability to do so.

LYN HEJINIAN

The Language of Inquiry [Introduction] >

PennSound

Photo: “London” (source unknown)

L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E

E C L I P S E

More fluency = more joy.

I love language that moves: moves from the abstract to the concrete, moves from showing to telling, moves from the general to the particular. Sometimes this movement goes in one direction, sometimes the other, and sometimes back and forth. But move it must. Move, move, move!

Language is a gift, a treasure of evolution but also a spark of the divine. The ancient Hebrew word dabar describes the power of a personal God to speak directly to men and women. In the Gospel of Saint John, Jesus is Logos, the Greek form of Word. The word spirit comes from the word meaning “to breathe,” and breath gives us life and something more, the ability to turn air into language. . . like magic.

Embrace grammar as powerful and purposeful.

Read dictionaries for fun and learning.

Adopt a favourite letter of the alphabet.

Consult a thesaurus to remind yourself of words you already know.

Honour the smallest distinctions—even between a and the.

Learn seven ways to invent words.

Become your own lexicographer.

Learn when and how to enrich your prose with foreign words.



ROY PETER CLARK, from The Glamour of Grammar: A Guide to the Magic and Mystery of Practical English, New York : Little Brown, 2010.

buy amazon

The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. – Ludwig Wittgenstein

The confidence she gained and the friendships she made were invaluable in helping her settle into her new home.



KATE TAYLOR, “New York Libraries’ Adult English Programs Face Cuts.” New York Times, May 30, 2010.