
J.-C. C. | Let’s pose ourselves a classic dilemma: the world is under threat, and we can only safeguard a few cultural objects. Civilisation might be wiped out, perhaps by a massive environmental catastrophe. We have to act fast. We cannot protect or save everything. So what do we choose? And in which media?
U. E. | We have already talked about how modern media formats quickly become obsolete. Why run the risk of choosing objects that may become mute and indecipherable? It is proven that books are superior to every other object that our cultural industries have put on the market in recent years. So, wanting to choose something easily transportable and that has shown itself equal to the ravages of time, I choose the book.
[Eco then goes on to say]: Having spoken so passionately in favour of books, I had better admit that the first thing I would save is my 250-gigabyte hard drive, which contains all my writing from the last thirty years. After that, if there were still time…
Jean-Claude Carrière & Umberto Eco, This is Not the End of the Book. London : Harvill Secker, 2011. p 31-3.
see also: Umberto Eco: ‘I’m a writer not a reader’
Photo source: The End — a set on Flickr